Legal Opinion

Roofner's Appeal

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 10, 1923No. Appeals, 4, 5 and 6PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Gawthrop, J.,

Appellants were the road supervisors of Franklin Township, Armstrong County. They were indicted and tried upon the charge of unlawfully neglecting and refusing to keep fit for public travel a certain public township road and allowing the same to become unsafe and dangerous for ordinary travel to the common nuisance of the citizens of the township. Toy and Zillefrow were acquitted and Ritchey was convicted. Judgment against the latter was arrested on the ground that the offense is no longer indictable in the court of quarter sessions, because, under section 240 of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Matter of Chapman v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  2. Commonwealth v. MeanySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1898

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Filippi v. City of ErieCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  2. Board of Commissioners v. Casper National BankWyoming Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Fiorelli v. City of ChesterCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. Richter v. Shelby CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 2008
  5. In re Certiorari of Arbitration Award Between Borough of Hollidaysburg & the Hollidaysburg Police Department Ass'nCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API