Legal Opinion · Dissent

Spokane Methodist Homes, Inc. v. Department of Labor & Industries

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 5, 1972No. 41982Published

1DissentWright, J.

(dissenting)—I in no way disagree with the majority view that abrogation of the doctrine of charitable immunity does not thereby bring charitable institutions under the workmen’s compensation laws. Charitable immunity is a rule of tort liability created by judicial decision, which could be, and was, abrogated by judicial decision. Workmen’s compensation is statutory, created by statute, governed by statute and can only be extended by statute.

In the case of Thurston County Chapter, American Nat’l Red Cross v. Department of Labor & Indus., 166 Wash. 488, 7 P.2d 577 (1932), this court said the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Allison v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Thurston Co. Chap. Amer. Etc. v. Dept. L. I.Washington Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Thurston County Chapter v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Konick v. ChampneysWashington Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Creedon v. LundeDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API