Legal Opinion

Brooks v. Dockside Seafood

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided December 2, 1999No. 98-311-M.PPublished

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GOLDBERG, Justice.

This case comes before us on a petition for certiorari filed by Irene Brooks (Brooks), a former employee of Dockside Seafood (Dockside), following a final decree by the Appellate Division of the Workers’ Compensation Court (Appellate Division), denying and dismissing two petitions for benefits. Brooks challenges the Appellate Division’s finding that the provisions of G.L.1956 § 28-35-61 govern her petitions, and that the six-month period allowed for the amendment or the modification of decrees of the Workers’ Compensation Court bars her claim for benefits.

Facts and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wehr, Inc. v. TruexSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1997
  2. Emmett v. Town of CoventrySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1984
  3. Salazar v. MacHine Works, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1995
  4. Provencher v. Glas-Kraft, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1970
  5. Luzzi v. ImondiSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API