Legal Opinion

Wehr, Inc. v. Truex

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided September 30, 1997No. 96-218 M.P., 96-277 M.PPublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

These consolidated cases come before us on cross-petitions for certiorari filed by both Wehr, Inc. (Wehr or employer), and Nancy Truex (Truex or employee) to review a final decree of the Appellate Division of the Workers’ Compensation Court awarding benefits to Truex pursuant to the partial-disability statute, G.L.1956 § 28-33-18. We deny both petitions for certiorari and affirm the final decree of the Workers’ Compensation Court Appellate Division. The undisputed facts insofar as pertinent to this appeal are as follows.

On April 25, 1994, both parties agreed to the entry of a consent…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. FengSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1980
  2. Pion v. Bess Eaton Donuts Flour Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1994
  3. Cabral v. Converse Rubber Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1979
  4. Maynard v. Rhode Island HospitalSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1988
  5. Claros v. Highland Employment AgencySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1994

4Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. FritzSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2002
  2. M.D.C. v. K.D.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2009
  3. Patrizia Prew v. Employee Retirement System of the City of ProvidenceSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2016
  4. McGuirl v. Anjou International Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1998
  5. Impulse Packaging, Inc. v. SicajanSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2005

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API