Kroger Co. v. Tollett
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HARBISON, Justice.
This case involves the interpretation and application of a state privilege tax contained in T.C.A. § 67 — 4102 Item B, entitled:
“Bottlers and manufacturers of soft drinks and substitutes therefor.”
The words “and substitutes therefor” were added to the title of the code section in the revision of the statute contained in 1963 Tennessee Public Acts, chapter 35. They are, in our opinion, of significance in ascertaining the legislative intent.
The taxpayer in this case, The Kroger Company, is neither a bottler nor a manufacturer of soft drinks but is one of the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Boston Stock Exchange v. State Tax CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
3Cited by6 opinions
- Jack Daniel Distillery, Lem Motlow, Prop. v. JacksonTennessee Supreme Court · 1987
- Comdata Network, Inc. v. State Department of RevenueTennessee Supreme Court · 1993
- Fleming v. YiCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1998
- FMC Corp. v. WoodsTennessee Supreme Court · 1981
- Dr. Pepper Pepsi-Cola Bottling Company of Dyersburg, LLC v. Reagan Farr, Commissioner of Tennessee Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2011
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.