Aalsburg v. Cashion

For this factually complicated case the respective findings and conclusions of the trial judge and of Division 3 appear comprehensively in the opinion next below (Aalsburg v. Cashion [1968], 14 Mich App 91). There is no need for repetition or supplementation thereof beyond observation (a) that the sketch appearing at page 93 of the reported opinion and its detailed adjunct, referring to composite Exhibits 14 and 15, have been most helpful in bringing to us a precise understanding of the main issue, 1 and (b) that a second survey, made in 1936 by the Kent County surveyor’s office, depicts the…