Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of Carpenters
Supreme Court of the United States
1DissentJustice Marshall
Section 4 of the Clayton Act provides that a damages action may be brought under the antitrust laws by “fajny person who [has been] injured in his business or property by reason of anything forbidden in the antitrust laws.” 15 U. S. C. § 15 (emphasis added). Despite the absence of an “articula-ble consideration of statutory policy” supporting the denial of standing, Blue Shield of Virginia v. McCready, 457 U. S. 465, 473 (1982), the Court today holds that the intended victim of a restraint of trade does not constitute a “person who [has been] injured in his business or property by reason of…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Illinois Brick Co. v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Story Parchment Co. v. Paterson Parchment Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Reiter v. Sonotone Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Bigelow v. RKO Radio Pictures, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.