Legal Opinion

Peebles v. Yamhill County

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 10, 2001No. 00-35665; D.C. No. CV-99-06211-JARPublished

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM *

Gary Peebles appeals the district court’s summary judgment in favor of defendant Yamhill County, and defendants James W. Carelle and Paul Groh of the Yamhill County Sheriffs Department. Peebles brought suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that he was falsely arrested for illegally videotaping an incident between himself and a neighbor. He also asserted related state law claims. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

We need not state the facts because the parties are familiar with them. The determinative issue is whether the officers had probable cause to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hunter v. BryantSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Freeman v. City of Santa AnaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  3. McGanty v. StaudenrausOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Sheets v. KnightOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  5. United States v. Darren Eugene HendersonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API