Legal Opinion

Gray v. Jenerette

King George County Circuit Court

Decided April 12, 2000No. Case No. 99-96Published

1Opinion of the Court

By Judge James W. Haley, Jr.

It has long been the rule in Virginia that a conveyance of land which is bounded by an abandoned road carries with it all the grantor’s interest in the former road, unless a contraiy intention is expressly set forth in the deed. Williams v. Miller, 184 Va. 274, 35 S.E.2d 127 (1945) .... Thus, while a grantor may reserve such a strip from a conveyance, he must do so expressly. No such reservation will arise by implication.

Tidewater Area Charities v. Harbour Gate Owners, 240 Va. 221, 227-28, 396 S.E.2d 661, 665 (1990). See also, 3A M.J., Boundaries, § 21, p. 344, n.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Neff v. ErnstCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Askins v. British-American Oil Producing Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
  3. Hummel v. YoungUtah Supreme Court · 1953
  4. City of Richmond v. Thompson's HeirsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1914
  5. Durbin v. Roanoke Building Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1908

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API