Legal Opinion

Edelstein v. Hacker

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 22, 1956Published

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from an order denying a motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant to rule 107 of the Rules of Civil Practice on the ground that the alleged agreement upon which the cause of action is founded is unenforcible under the Statute of Frauds. Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with $10 costs. In our opinion, the only cause of action pleaded is based on an alleged breach of an oral agreement to lease a gasoline service station to respondent for a period of 21 years. That agreement is unenforcible under the Statute of Frauds, and, under the facts as pleaded,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Dung v. . ParkerNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  2. Redlark Realty Corp. v. MinkinNew York Court of Appeals · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API