Legal Opinion
In Re DMD
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)
Decided March 27, 2012No. 14-11-00462-CVPublished
1Opinion of the Court
363 S.W.3d 916 (2012)
In the Interest of D.M.D., T.S.D., T.M.D., D.M.D. a/k/a D.D., Children.
No. 14-11-00462-CV.
Court of Appeals of Texas, Houston (14th Dist.).
March 27, 2012.
William M. Thursland, Houston, for appellant.
Sandra D. Hachem, Houston, for appellee.
Panel consists of Justices SEYMORE, BOYCE, and McCALLY.
OPINION
CHARLES W. SEYMORE, Justice.
In four issues, appellant contends the evidence is legally and factually insufficient to support the trial court's termination of appellant's parent-child relationship with her four children, D.M.D., T.S.D., T.M.D., and D.M.D. a/k/a D.D. We affirm.
I.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Holley v. AdamsTexas Supreme Court · 1976
- Holick v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1985
- In the Interest of J.M.M.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2002
- In the Interest of A.A.A.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2008
- in the Interest of D.S.P. and H.R.P., Children, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2006
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.