Kauder v. Kauder

Appellant contends that the 30-day period within which she could appeal the court’s entry of February 21, 1973, pursuant to App. R. 4(A), was sixspended by the subsequent reconsideration given by the court to the referee’s report. She further asserts that that reconsidera*267tion was the equivalent of a new trial, and hence that the journal entry of April 10, 1973, from which she purports to appeal, was itself a final appealable order.

We are unable to agree with appellant. In addition to establishing the 30-day period for appeal, App. R. 4(A) provides the exclusive means by which the running of…