Legal Opinion

In re Levingston

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided February 25, 2000No. 00-B-0161PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*875ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS

PER CURIAM.*

This disciplinary matter arises from a petition for consent discipline filed by respondent, David L. Levingston, an attorney licensed to practice law in Louisiana but who is currently suspended.1 The Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) concurred in respondent’s petition, and the disciplinary board recommended the proposed discipline be accepted.

UNDERLYING FACTS

In September 1995, Rufus Meyers retained respondent to handle the succession of his late wife, Erika Meyers. The succession was not complicated or unusual; no administration was necessary…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re QuaidSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
  2. In re LevingstonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1996
  3. In Re JuakaliSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1997
  4. In Re WatkinsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1995
  5. In re LevingstonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1991

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re SimpsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2007
  2. In Re CalahanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API