Lapkin v. Garland Bloodworth, Inc.
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
KENNETH L. BUETTNER, Judge:
T1 Third-Party - Defendants/Appellants Garland Bloodworth, Inc., d/b/a Bloodworth & Associates (Law Firm), Garland Blood-worth, 1 and John Alberts (collectively Attorneys) appeal from summary judgment granted in favor of Defendant/Third-Party Plaintif{/Judgment Assignor Leonard Lap-kin, M.D. in Lapkin's unjust eprichment claim. Because we find no substantial issue of material fact upon the record presented, and because we find Lapkin was entitled to judgment as a matter of law, we affirm summary judgment. However, we reverse and remand for modification of two…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Seitsinger v. Dockum Pontiac Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- N.C. Corff Partnership, Ltd. v. OXY USA, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1996
- Martin v. Chapel, Wilkinson, Riggs, and AbneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1981
- Armor v. LantzWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2000
- Merchants' Insurance Co. of Providence v. AbbottMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1881
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Slover v. Equitable Variable Life InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2006
- Tillman v. Camelot Music, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- Overka v. American Airlines, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2010
- Blondell v. LittlepageCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2009
- Childs v. UNIFIED LIFE INSURANCE COMPANYDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2011
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.