Legal Opinion
State v. Jordan
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided August 30, 2000No. 1999-1668PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 89 Ohio St.3d 488.] THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLANT, v. JORDAN, APPELLEE. [Cite as State v. Jordan,
2000-Ohio-225.] Criminal procedure—Prosecution for unlawful possession of dangerous ordnance in violation of R.C. 2923.17—State not required to prove that defendant knows of the specific characteristics of the weapon or item possessed that bring it within the statutory definition of “dangerous ordnance.” (No. 99-1668—Submitted May 10, 2000—Decided August 30, 2000.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Montgomery County, No. 17686.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United States v. HarrissSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Staples v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Dennis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Liparota v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- M6 Motors, Inc. v. Nissan of N. Olmsted, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2014
- State v. GarnerOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
- State v. Malone, 9-06-43 (10-15-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
- State v. SchneiderOhio Court of Appeals · 2025
- City of Akron v. BrownOhio Court of Appeals · 2018