Legal Opinion

Ex parte Demaurez

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 16, 1939PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILBUR, Circuit Judge.

The petitioner, acting in propria personam, presents a voluminous document, one hundred and' forty typewritten pages, containing an application for a writ of habeas corpus, addressed to the • Senior Circuit Judge, an application to proceed in forma pauperis, and a petition for a writ of certiorari, also addressed to the Senior Circuit Judge. He alleges that his petition for a writ of habeas corpus was denied by the United ’ States District Court for the Western District of Washington, and that leave to appeal therefrom in forma pauperis was denied by this Court June 14,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Prussian v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. De Maurez v. SwopeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Smith v. JohnstonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940
  2. Paolo v. GarfinkelCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1952
  3. De Maurez v. SquierCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1944
  4. Maurez v. SwopeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940
  5. United States v. De MaurezDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1943

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API