BERNER CHEESE CORPORATION v. Krug
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1ConcurrenceAnn Walsh Bradley, J.
¶ 74. {concurring). I agree with the majority that there was insufficient *284evidence to present a punitive damages question to the jury. I also agree that the circuit court did not err in dismissing Berner's breach of fiduciary duty claim. Unlike the majority, however, the circuit court based its determination on an insufficiency of evidence and not on the majority's erroneous interpretation of what constitutes a transaction.
¶ 75. I write separately because the majority narrows the attorney discipline rule that serves as a basis for its opinion. In interpreting SCR 20:1.8(a) (Conflict of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Weiss v. United Fire & Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1995
- Matter of SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
- Reget v. PaigeCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2001
- Armstrong v. MorrowWisconsin Supreme Court · 1917
- Duggan v. GonsalvesMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2005
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.