Legal Opinion
Hackett v. Healthworks Medical
District Court, W.D. Kentucky
Decided May 3, 2022No. 5:21-cv-00157Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY PADUCAH DIVISION HERBERT HACKETT PLAINTIFF v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:21-CV-157-TBR HEALTHWORKS MEDICAL DEFENDANT MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff, Herbert Hackett, filed a pro se, in forma pauperis
42 U.S.C. § 1983
civil-rights complaint (DN 12). This matter is before the Court for screening pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) and McGore v. Wrigglesworth,
114 F.3d 601
(6th Cir. 1997), overruled on other grounds by Jones v. Bock,
549 U.S. 199
(2007). For the reasons set forth below, the Court will dismiss this action. I. STATEMENT OF CLAIMS Plaintiff…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Jones v. BockSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Darryl McGore v. Gene L. Wrigglesworth, Chief Sheriff Richard Chinelli, Administrator Ingham County Sheriff's DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- Lugar v. Edmondson Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.