Grant County Black Sands Irrigation District v. United States Bureau of Reclamation
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BRYSON, Circuit Judge.
I
In 1937, Congress authorized a multipurpose reclamation project known as the Columbia Basin project, which was designed to irrigate farmland in central Washington with water drawn from the Columbia River. Over time, water that seeped into the ground from the surface irrigation created significant quantities of artificially stored groundwater in the Quincy Basin area. The Washington Department of Ecology began managing the Quincy Basin groundwater in 1973 but later accepted the federal government’s claim to ownership of that water. See Flint v. United States, 906 F.2d…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Novosteel Sa v. United States, and Bethlehem Steel Corporation and U.S. Steel Group, a Unit of Usx Corporation (Now Known as United States Steel Llc)Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Ivanhoe Irrigation District v. McCrackenSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Aerolineas Argentinas, and Pakistan International Airlines v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Baley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
- California Industrial Facilities Resources, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Associations v. United States Department of the InteriorDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2014
- Center for Biological Diversity v. United States Bureau of ReclamationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2026
- Grant County Black Sands Irrigation District v. United States Bureau of ReclamationSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.