Legal Opinion

John A. Frye Shoe Co. v. Williams

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided December 30, 1942PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCox, J.

This is an action of contract or tort, the count in contract in the declaration being to recover damages for an alleged breach of warranty in the sale of composition soles that are used in the manufacture of shoes, and the count in tort being to recover damages for the alleged fraudulent representations of the defendant concerning the subject matter of this sale.' The case was referred to an auditor, whose findings of fact were to be final. The defendant’s motion, hereinafter referred to, to recommit the report to the auditor was denied, subject to his exception. He also *658excepted to the…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Bates v. SouthgateMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
  2. Vulcan Metals Co. v. Simmons Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1918
  3. Mabardy v. McHughMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
  4. Howland v. StoweMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  5. Deming v. DarlingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Sheehy v. Lipton Industries, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1987
  2. Briggs v. Carol Cars, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
  3. Pietrazak v. McDermottMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1960
  4. New England Factors, Inc. v. GenstilMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
  5. Bouchard v. BouchardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API