State ex rel. Matthews v. Zangerle

OPINION

The pleadings raise the following questions :

1. (a) Were the provisions of §2976-101, GC, repealed by necéssary implication, by *663reason of the enactment of the Uniform Tax Levy law in 1927? -and (b) If not, are ¡a¡d provisions-invalid because .they do not definitely specify the number of years for which a given levy may be voted.?

2. Do the provisions of §2976-101, GC, permit overlapping levies, Le., á second levy voted to be placed on the duplicate benre 1ho expiration of the prior voted levy?

3. Is a formally called and attended joint session of both budget commissions of the counties…