Farley v. Farley
District Court, M.D. Tennessee
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
WISEMAN, Senior District Judge.
I. Introduction
Pending are plaintiff Sandra Farley’s (‘Plaintiff’) objections, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(a), to a protective order entered in this case on September 27, 1996 by U.S. Magistrate Judge Juliet Griffin. These provisions allow the Court to review and revise the protective order if the order is found to be “clearly erroneous or contrary to law.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A); Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(a). As a preliminary matter, the Court notes that Plaintiffs objections were timely filed on October 7, 1996 — within the…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Alabama v. PughSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Jacqueline Pearson, Individually and as Parent & Natural Guardian of Lindsay Pearson v. Bruce Miller Luzerne County Children & Youth Services, Inc. Luzerne County Children & Youth Services, Inc., Defendant/third-Party v. Kidspeace National Centers for Kids in Crisis, Inc., Third Party Luzerne County Children & Youth Services, Inc. Kidspeace National Centers for Kids in Crisis, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- John B. v. GoetzDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2010
- Lopez v. Metropolitan Government of NashvilleDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2009
- Pearson v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Deleon v. Putnam Valley Board of EducationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.