Britton v. Johnson-Mcquity Motor Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
EiSTES, C.
Parties- will be re-errad to as they appeared in the trial ■court, inverse to their order here. The motor company sued Britton bn, replevin for two automobiles, claiming the right of possession by reason of special interest under a chattel mortgage given to secare a certain note, the mortgage and note being exhibited, alleging that the value of the property was $450, and prayed judgment for return thereof or their value in the sum of $376.28. By answer, Britton admitted the execution of the note and pleaded recoupment against same for dJamages in the sum of $300 for…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Beard v. HerndonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Colonial Jewelry Co. v. BridgesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Jesse French Piano & Organ Co. v. BodovitzSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- O. K. Transfer & Storage Co. v. NeillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- De Groff v. CarhartSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bleakley v. BowlbySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
- Wichita Flour Mills Co. v. Guymon Equity ExchangeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- Ford v. HallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Mascho v. Harbour-Longmire Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938