Legal Opinion

Britton v. Johnson-Mcquity Motor Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 1, 1926No. 16795PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

EiSTES, C.

Parties- will be re-errad to as they appeared in the trial ■court, inverse to their order here. The motor company sued Britton bn, replevin for two automobiles, claiming the right of possession by reason of special interest under a chattel mortgage given to secare a certain note, the mortgage and note being exhibited, alleging that the value of the property was $450, and prayed judgment for return thereof or their value in the sum of $376.28. By answer, Britton admitted the execution of the note and pleaded recoupment against same for dJamages in the sum of $300 for…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Beard v. HerndonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  2. Colonial Jewelry Co. v. BridgesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  3. Jesse French Piano & Organ Co. v. BodovitzSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  4. O. K. Transfer & Storage Co. v. NeillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  5. De Groff v. CarhartSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bleakley v. BowlbySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
  2. Wichita Flour Mills Co. v. Guymon Equity ExchangeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  3. Ford v. HallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  4. Mascho v. Harbour-Longmire Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API