Legal Opinion

Brooks v. Ulanet

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided October 4, 1949PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlackmer, J.

This is an action in contract brought originally by Charles H. Brooks. The complaint was in two counts, the first being the common counts with specification for labor and materials furnished, .the second being for breach of contract. The only question involved relates to an amendment which defendant claims improperly substituted a new party.

Charles H. Brooks was improved as the first witness. During his cross examination the following took place:

(Counsel at the bench)

Mr. Bourdon: We submit that there is considerable question as to whether or not this person is in fact the plaintiff here.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dunbar v. Farnum WifeSupreme Court of Vermont · 1937
  2. Waterman v. Connecticut & Passumpsic Rivers RailroadSupreme Court of Vermont · 1858
  3. Glass v. Newport Clothing Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1939
  4. Smith v. Badlam and AndersonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1940
  5. Turner, Admx. v. BraggSupreme Court of Vermont · 1947

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Thorgaard Plumbing & Heating Co., Inc. v. County of KingWashington Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Orkin Exterminating Company v. O'HANLONSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  3. Sexton v. GreerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1977
  4. Austin v. HallstromSupreme Court of Vermont · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API