Legal Opinion
Gatch v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
District Court, E.D. South Carolina
Decided September 3, 1956No. Civ. A. No. 5530PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
WYCHE, District Judge.
In compliance with Rule 52(a) of the Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. I find the facts specially and state my conclusions of law thereon, in the above cause, as follows:
Findings of Fact
1. On or about April 22, 1955, plaintiff purchased form the defendant, a David Bradley Weed Cutter for a total purchase price with tax of $204.92.
2. The defendant represented to the plaintiff, before he bought the weed cutter that it was safe in every respect and that there was no danger to the operator in using it.
3. The representations were made by the defendant with the intention…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Robb v. VosSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Equitable Trust Co. of New York v. Connecticut Brass & Mfg. Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1923
- Ebner v. Haverty Furniture Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1924
- Liquid Carbonic Co. v. CoclinSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1931
- Albert Lea Foundry Co. v. Iowa Sav. BankCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hipp v. KENNESAW LIFE & ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANYDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1968