Legal Opinion

Maney v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy R. R.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 5, 1893PublishedCited by 26 opinions

Memorandum.—Action for personal injuries. Writ of error to the Circuit Court of Cass County, to reverse a judgment rendered by that court; the Hon. Cyrus Epler, Circuit Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the November term, A. D. 1892.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court,

Boggs, J.

This is an action on the case brought in the name of Mary Maney, as administratrix of the estate of Daniel Maney, deceased, for the benefit of Mary Maney, widow, Bosa A., Daniel M., Mary J., Albert L. and Francis L. Maney, children of the deceased, to recover damages under the provisions of sections 1 and 2 of chapter 70 of K. S., for the killing of said Daniel Maney. The declaration contained five counts. A demurrer to the fifth, and a motion to strike out certain allegations in the fourth count, were sustained, to which the plaintiff below and here excepted.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Chicago & Alton Railroad v. ShannonIllinois Supreme Court · 1867
  2. Chicago & Rock Island Railroad v. MorrisIllinois Supreme Court · 1861
  3. Conant v. GriffinIllinois Supreme Court · 1868
  4. Arnold v. Illinois Central RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1876
  5. Jacksonville Southeastern Railway Co. v. SouthworthIllinois Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Johnston v. . FargoNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
  2. Harraz v. SnyderAppellate Court of Illinois · 1996
  3. Rowe v. RichardsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. MahoneyIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. MetcalfNebraska Supreme Court · 1895

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API