Schoenberg v. Rose
New York City Court
Action by Mark J. Schoenberg against William R. Rose and others, executors of Max E. Bernheimer, deceased. Judgment for plaintiff.
1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.
Mr. Max E. Bernheimer, president, and Mr. Freeland, secretary, of a corporation, on September 24, 1913, were in attendance at the Supreme Court, Brooklyn, in an action then on trial in which the corporation was the defendant.
The plaintiff in this action, a physician in practice in this state for 12 years, earning a good income and making a specialty of treating the eyes, ears, nose, and throat, was also in attendance, as a witness on behalf of the plaintiff in that action, and, while he was testifying, Mr. Bernheimer fell from a chair in the courtroom to the floor, unconscious.
Counsel who…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Patterson v. . PattersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
- Crane v. . BaudouineNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- McGuire v. . HughesNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
- Meisenbach v. Southern Cooperage Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1891
- Cotnam v. WisdomSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1907
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Zumwalt v. SchwarzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- UnitedHealthcare Services, Inc. v. AsprinioNew York Supreme Court · 2015
- In re the Claim of DavisNew York Surrogate's Court · 1928