Legal Opinion

Meisenbach v. Southern Cooperage Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 5, 1891PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Appeal from the St. Louis City Circuit Court. — Hon. James E. Withrow, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.

— This action is brought by a surgeon to recover the reasonable value of his services in and about the treatment of Jacob Eichacker, who was severely hurt while employed by the defendant corporation. The defendant Fredericks was the superintendent of the corporation. At the close of the evidence the court instructed the jury that the plaintiff *233could not recover ; and the only question for consideration on this appeal is, whether this was a proper direction.

There was no evidence as to the character or powers of the corporation, and no specific evidence as to the scope of the authority of Mr.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Crane v. . BaudouineNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  2. Smith v. WatsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1842
  3. McCarthy v. Missouri RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1884

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. McGuire v. . HughesNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
  2. Hunicke v. Meramec Quarry Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1914
  3. Spelman v. Gold Coin Mining & Milling Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Ghio v. Schaper Bros.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1914
  5. Weinsberg v. St. Louis Cordage Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1909

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API