Legal Opinion
State v. Rohrig
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided November 2, 2021No. 20AP-579PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[Cite as State v. Rohrig,
2021-Ohio-3903.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT State of Ohio, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 20AP-579 v. : (M.C. No. 2019 CRB 016888) Kyle Rohrig, : (REGULAR CALENDAR) Defendant-Appellant. : D E C I S I O N Rendered on November 2, 2021 On brief: Metz, Bailey & McLoughlin, Lauren R. Swihart, and Michael K. Fultz, for appellee. Argued: Lauren R. Swihart. On brief: Kyle Rohrig, pro se. Argued: Kyle Rohrig. APPEAL from the Franklin County Municipal Court MENTEL, J. {¶ 1} Kyle Rohrig appeals from the judgment of the Franklin County Municipal Court…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Knapp v. Edwards LaboratoriesOhio Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. ScottOhio Court of Appeals · 1965
- State v. CopleyOhio Court of Appeals · 1991
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. MarshallOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
- State v. RohrigOhio Court of Appeals · 2023
- Yaklevich v. DinneenOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
- State v. RohrigOhio Court of Appeals · 2024