Legal Opinion

Smith v. McDonald

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 20, 1912No. 7,506PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Action by Philip McDonald against Belle M. Smith. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtFelt, C. J.

Appellee brought this action against appellant and Samuel McDonald to recover judgment on a promissory note executed by defendants. Samuel McDonald, who was husband of appellant at the time the note was exe*465cuted, was not served with process, and the case proceeded to final judgment against appellant.

The complaint was in one paragraph, to which appellant filed an answer in five paragraphs. A separate demurrer to the third and fourth paragraphs was sustained as to the third and- overruled as to the fourth, which, like the second and fifth paragraphs, set up special matter in defense.

These were…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Citizens' National Bank v. JudyIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Buchanan v. Berkshire Life InsuranceIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Thomas v. DaleIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Webb v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceIndiana Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Brown v. WillIndiana Supreme Court · 1885

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Abdon v. WallaceIndiana Court of Appeals · 1929
  2. Hatfield v. RookerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914
  3. Moore v. MooreIndiana Court of Appeals · 1922
  4. Hedges v. MehringIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917
  5. Burkhart v. Simms, Admr.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1945

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API