Legal Opinion

Smith v. Duncan

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1881No. 8052PublishedCited by 7 opinions

From the Marion Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtWoods, J.

The appellant obtained a precept for the collection of a sum claimed to be due from the appellee for á. proportionate share of the expense or price of the improvement of Meridian street in Indianapolis. Duncan appealed from the precept to the circuit court, which sustained his. demurrer to the transcript of the proceedings, and gave judgment for the appellee. The appellant saved an exception and has assigned the ruling as an error.

The appellee makes two principal objections to the proceedings :

First. That the ordinance under which the work was doné is void;

Second. That the assessment against…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Bank of Augusta v. EarleSupreme Court of the United States · 1839
  2. Zottman v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862
  3. Birdsall v. . ClarkNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  4. Thomson v. Mayor of BoonvilleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1875
  5. City of Oakland v. CarpentierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. City of Bluffton v. MillerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1904
  2. Ray v. City of JeffersonvilleIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Taber v. GrafmillerIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Garner v. City of AnnistonAlabama Court of Appeals · 1911
  5. Indiana Truck Farm Co. v. Town of SchneiderIndiana Court of Appeals · 1920

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API