Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Burstein

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 10, 1989PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Decree unanimously reversed on the law without costs and petition granted, in accordance with the following memorandum: The Surrogate erred in decreeing "that the Testatrix did not give the Trustees general power to invade the principal of the trust of Larry Burstein”. "The first principal in all construction proceedings is the intention of the testator as expressed in [her] will, and all other rules of interpretation are subordinate to this primary one” (Matter of Symonds, 79 AD2d 24, 25). This intent "must be gleaned not from a single word or phrase but from a sympathetic reading of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re the Accounting of United States Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1957
  2. In re the Estate of SymondsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  3. In re the Estate of ShannonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Mohr v. CavenderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API