Legal Opinion
Bouquett v. Clemmer
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided July 10, 1985No. C-3-82-146PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ENTRY SUSTAINING IN PART AND OVERRULING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS; INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS TO FILE ANSWERS WITHIN STATED PERIOD OF TIME
RICE, District Judge.
This is a civil rights action in which the Plaintiff seeks redress for the alleged malicious prosecution he suffered at the hands of Defendants. The Plaintiff in this case is a black ophthalmologist. There are eight Defendants herein: R.H. Clemmer, Charles E. Gentry and Robert Reynolds, former members of the Organized Crime Unit of the City of Dayton Police Department; the City of Dayton; two agencies of the State…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- In Re GhaliOhio Court of Appeals · 1992
- Sims v. KernanDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1998
- Adam M. Glowka v. Warren County Child Support Enforcement Agency, et al.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2025
- Allen v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and CorrectionDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2021
- Arnoff v. Allen County Correctional InstitutionDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2022
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.