Legal Opinion

Thompson v. BD. OF EDUCATION, CITY OF MILLVILLE

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided February 2, 1951PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

12 N.J. Super. 92 (1951)

79 A.2d 100

CLARENCE W. THOMPSON AND RUTH M. THOMPSON, HIS WIFE, PLAINTIFFS,

v.

BOARD OF EDUCATION, CITY OF MILLVILLE, DEFENDANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Cumberland County Court Law Division.

Decided February 2, 1951.

Mr. Nathaniel Rogovoy, attorney for the plaintiffs.

Messrs. Greenblatt & Greenblatt, attorneys for the defendant.

HORUVITZ, J.C.C.

This is a motion for judgment on pleadings, pursuant to the Rule 3:12-3.

The complaint is in two counts by husband and wife. In the first count, the female plaintiff seeks a recovery for personal injuries, alleging that on the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Olesiewicz v. City of CamdenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1924
  2. Falcone v. Board of EducationNew York County Court, Essex County · 1939
  3. Leeds v. City of Atlantic CityAtlantic County Circuit Court, N.J. · 1935
  4. Flammer v. MorelliSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1924
  5. Kane v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1941

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Yanero v. DavisKentucky Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Schwindel v. Meade CountyKentucky Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Anneker v. Quinn-Robbins Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Auerbach v. Jersey Wahoos Swim ClubNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2004
  5. Thompson v. BD. OF ED., MILLVILLENew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API