Legal Opinion
McClintock v. Robinson
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 16, 1936No. Civ. No. 1638PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
TURRENTINE, J., pro tem.
Respondent filed his motion to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the appellant had not filed his opening brief within the time provided by law. Subsequent to the filing of the motion, but before the hearing thereof, appellant had served and filed his opening brief.
On the authority of Graybiel v. Consolidated Associations, Ltd., 14 Cal. App. (2d) 547 [58 Pac. (2d) 665], the motion is denied.
Barnard, P. J., and Marks, J., concurred.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Graybiel v. Consolidated Associations, Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1936
3Cited by1 opinion
- McClintock v. RobinsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936