Legal Opinion
McClintock v. Robinson
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 16, 1936No. Civ. No. 1638Published
1Opinion of the Court
15 Cal.App.2d 511 (1936)
EARL McCLINTOCK, Respondent,
v.
LOUIS ROBINSON, Appellant.
Civ. No. 1638.
California Court of Appeals. Fourth Appellate District.
July 16, 1936.
Forgy, Reinhaus & Forgy for Appellant.
L. E. Dadmun for Respondent.
Turrentine, J., pro tem.
[1] Respondent filed his motion to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the appellant had not filed his opening brief within the time provided by law. Subsequent to the filing of the motion, but before the hearing thereof, appellant had served and filed his opening brief.
On the authority of Graybiel v. Consolidated Associations, Ltd., 14…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Graybiel v. Consolidated Associations, Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1936
- McClintock v. RobinsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936