Legal Opinion

Metropolitan Water District of Salt Lake & Sandy v. Sorf

Utah Supreme Court

Decided May 10, 2013No. 20110443PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Justice PARRISH,

opinion of the Court:

INTRODUCTION

11 Petitioner Zdenek Sorf appeals the denial of his motion to set aside a default judgment. The district court entered a default judgment against Mr. Sorf, awarding the Metropolitan Water District of Salt Lake and Sandy (District) certain rights over Mr. Sorf's residential property and enjoining him from making further improvements to his backyard. The district court denied Mr. Sorf's motion to set aside the default judgment, holding that Mr. Sorf had been properly served and that he had not proffered a meritorious defense. We hold that the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Menzies v. GaletkaUtah Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Lund v. BrownUtah Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Garcia v. GarciaUtah Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Judson v. Wheeler RV Las Vegas, L.L.C.Utah Supreme Court · 2012
  5. McKean v. Mountain View Memorial Estates, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1966

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Brady v. ParkUtah Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Utah Resources International, Inc. v. Mark Technologies Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 2014
  3. McBroom v. Shauna Child SchmunkUtah Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Metro. Water Dist. of Salt Lake & Sandy v. SorfUtah Supreme Court · 2019
  5. Metropolitan Water v. SorfCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2023

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API