Miller v. Pro-Transportation
Court of Appeals of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
John Mauzy Pittman, Judge.
Carl Miller was employed by Pro-Transportation as a truck driver. Appellant is Mr.
Miller’s wife. Appellant wanted to ride as a passenger with her husband as he drove for Pro-Transportation. To obtain Pro-Transportation’s permission to do so, appellant executed a passenger authorization application on May 23, 1998. In it appellant agreed that, in consideration for her being permitted to ride as a passenger, she would hold Pro-Transportation harmless from any liability for any damage or injury she might receive while riding in Pro-Transportation’s truck. The passenger…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Plant v. WilburSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
- Farmers Bank of Greenwood v. PerrySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
- Fryar v. RobertsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
3Cited by5 opinions
- Jordan v. Diamond Equipment & Supply Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
- Finagin v. Arkansas Development Finance AuthoritySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
- Trujillo v. TK Martial Arts Academy, LLCCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2015
- Jordan v. Diamond Equipment & Supply Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
- Jordan v. Diamond Equipment & Supply Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2005