Legal Opinion

Miller v. Pro-Transportation

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided June 19, 2002No. CA 02-83PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

John Mauzy Pittman, Judge.

Carl Miller was employed by Pro-Transportation as a truck driver. Appellant is Mr.

Miller’s wife. Appellant wanted to ride as a passenger with her husband as he drove for Pro-Transportation. To obtain Pro-Transportation’s permission to do so, appellant executed a passenger authorization application on May 23, 1998. In it appellant agreed that, in consideration for her being permitted to ride as a passenger, she would hold Pro-Transportation harmless from any liability for any damage or injury she might receive while riding in Pro-Transportation’s truck. The passenger…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Plant v. WilburSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  2. Farmers Bank of Greenwood v. PerrySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
  3. Fryar v. RobertsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Jordan v. Diamond Equipment & Supply Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
  2. Finagin v. Arkansas Development Finance AuthoritySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  3. Trujillo v. TK Martial Arts Academy, LLCCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2015
  4. Jordan v. Diamond Equipment & Supply Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
  5. Jordan v. Diamond Equipment & Supply Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API