Legal Opinion
Mullinax v. State
Court of Appeals of Arkansas
Decided May 1, 1996No. CA CR 95-698PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JAMES R. Cooper, Judge.
The appellant entered a conditional plea of guilty to driving while intoxicated pursuant to Rule 24.3(b) of the Arkansas Rules of Criminal Procedure. The appellant was fined $250.00, ordered to pay court costs of $403.00, and had his driver’s license suspended for ninety days- He was also ordered to complete an alcohol safety program and sentenced to one day in jail. On appeal, he argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress because the roadblock at which he was stopped was not implemented in a lawful manner. We disagree and affirm.
In reviewing a…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. Brignoni-PonceSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Brown v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. Martinez-FuerteSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Michigan Department of State Police v. SitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. DowneyTennessee Supreme Court · 1997
- Mullinax v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
- Whalen v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2015
- State v. DowneyTennessee Supreme Court · 1997
- Whalen v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2015