Edward O. Mueller v. Rayon Consultants, Incorporated, and William R. Schmitz
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Per curiam
The petition to vacate our order of August 28, 1959, is denied by the court sitting en bcmc. Upon reconsideration we find that the application for leave to appeal was timely inasmuch as it was made to us within 10 days of the order of the district judge that contained the 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b) statement. Because in our judgment the grant of leave to appeal will not fulfill the purpose expressed in the statute, we, in our discretion, adhere to our previous decision denying leave to appeal.
2Cited by13 opinions
- Costas Hadjipateras, Nicholas Hadjipateras and Dimitri Dracos v. Pacifica, S. A., and George TsakalotosCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
- Mull v. Colt Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1962
- Houston Fearless Corporation v. Guy Teter, No. I.A. 25Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1962
- Joseph Walters v. Moore-Mccormack Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
- Al-Jundi v. Estate of RockefellerDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1990
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.