Legal Opinion

In RE MARRIAGE OF McALEAVY v. McAleavy

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 7, 1989No. 87-2341PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteinmetz, J.

This case presents two issues. The first issue is whether sec. 801.05(11), Stats., 1 requires as a prerequisite to the establishment of personal jurisdiction in an action affecting the family, that the parties must have lived in a marital relationship in the state of Wisconsin for at least six months within the six years immediately preceding commencement of the action. The trial court determined that the six months in six years test is one of three possible methods for establishing personal jurisdiction. The court concluded that sec. 801.05(11), should be read to allow the six months in six…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. First National Leasing Corp. v. City of MadisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Dillon v. DillonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Block v. BlockWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Central National Bank of Wausau v. DustinCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1982
  5. McClellan v. McClellanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1970

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cashman v. CashmanConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
  2. Marriage of Daniel-Nordin v. NordinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Barker v. BarkerSupreme Court of Georgia · 2014
  4. Taylor v. TaylorSupreme Court of Delaware · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API