Legal Opinion
Cashman v. Cashman
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided May 21, 1996No. 14179PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLavery, J.
The defendant appeals from the judgment of the trial court granting the plaintiffs motion to dismiss on the ground that the court lacks personal jurisdiction over the plaintiff. On appeal, the defendant claims that the trial court improperly (1) found that General Statutes § 46b-46 (b)1 was not applicable to the defendant’s motion for modification, (2) found that § 46b-46 (b) was not satisfied because Connecticut was not the domicile of both parties at the time of dissolution, and (3) concluded that the exercise of personal jurisdiction over the plaintiff would violate due process. We…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Kulko v. Superior Court of Cal., City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Gural v. FazzinoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
- Panganiban v. PanganibanConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- Tri-State Tank Corp. v. Higganum Heating, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1997
- Barker v. BarkerSupreme Court of Georgia · 2014
- Farino v. Farino, No. Fa 98-0408944 S (May 12, 1998)Connecticut Superior Court · 1998
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.