Legal Opinion

Cottman Transmission Systems, Inc. v. Hocap Corp.

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided August 20, 2002No. AC 22054PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

LAVERY, C. J.

The plaintiff, Cottman Transmission Systems, Inc., appeals from the trial court’s judgment rendered in favor of the defendant, Hocap Corporation, after the court granted the defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court improperly granted the defendant’s motion on the basis of the court’s conclusion that the plaintiff lacked standing to bring the breach of contract action that is at issue in this appeal. We agree with the plaintiff and conclude that because the plaintiff had standing, the court…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Tomlinson v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  2. Lawrence Brunoli, Inc. v. Town of BranfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
  3. AvalonBay Communities, Inc. v. Town of OrangeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
  4. Baxter v. CampSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1898
  5. Gilman v. PedersenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Neiman v. Yale UniversitySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
  2. Chila v. StuartConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
  3. Cardi Materials Corp. v. Connecticut Landscaping Bruzzi Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2003
  4. Hee K. Cho and Min S. Cho v. Alupang Beach Club, Inc. and Steven KasperbauerSupreme Court of Guam · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API