Legal Opinion

United States v. Anthony Digeronimo, George Holtmeyer, John Romeo and Robert Virga

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided May 3, 1979No. 811-814, Dockets 78-1434 to 78-1437PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FEINBERG, Circuit Judge:

Anthony DiGeronimo, George Holtmeyer, John Romeo and Robert Virga appeal from judgments of conviction, after a jury trial in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, for conspiring to steal goods moving in interstate commerce and to receive and possess those goods in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371, for obstructing interstate commerce through robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1951 (the Hobbs Act) and for receiving and possessing goods stolen from interstate commerce in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 659. The trial judge, Chief Judge Jacob…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Bell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  3. Simpson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Heflin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  5. Prince v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. United States v. Harold v. Gleason, Paul Luftig and J. Michael CarterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
  2. United States v. Maldonado-RiveraCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
  3. United States v. Louis WernerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
  4. United States v. Maldonado-RiveraCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
  5. United States v. Russell Reed, James S. Doyle, and Thomas Francis RyanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API