Baum v. Village of Chittenango
District Court, N.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
Decision and Order
SHARPE, United States Magistrate Judge.
1. Introduction
Pending are cross-motions to compel document production by plaintiff, Ann Baum, and by the defendants (hereinafter, “Chittenango”). Baum seeks production of an administrative transcript, and Chittenango seeks letters prepared by Baum’s attorney that were given to her trial expert.1 Chittenango opposes production because the transcript is equally available to Baum, and Baum opposes production because of the work-product doctrine.
For the following reasons, Chittenango’s motion is granted and Baum’s denied.
II. Background
Pursu…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Tabron v. GraceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- In Re Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- United States v. John G. McKay Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Lugosch v. CongelDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2003
- Krause v. Buffalo & Erie County Workforce Development Consortium, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 2006
- Krause v. Buffalo & Erie County Workforce Development Consortium, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 2005
- Alleyne v. New York State Education DepartmentDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2008
- Colindres v. Quietflex ManufacturingDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2005
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.