Legal Opinion

IDAHO WOOL GROWERS ASSOC. v. Schafer

District Court, D. Idaho

Decided July 1, 2009No. CV-08-394-S-BLWPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER RE: IWGA’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Docket No. 23)

B. LYNN WINMILL, Chief Judge.

INTRODUCTION

The Court has before it Plaintiff Idaho Wool Growers Association’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 23). The Court heard oral argument on June 18, 2009. For the reasons expressed below, the Court will grant the Motion.

BACKGROUND

The Forest Service established two eommittees-the “RADT Committee” and the “Payette Principles Committee” (collectively “Committees”) 1 — to study the risk of disease transmission from domestic sheep to bighorn sheep. Plaintiffs Idaho Wool…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Bennett v. SpearSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Summers v. Earth Island InstituteSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  5. Whitman v. American Trucking Assns., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Judicial Watch, Inc. v. United States Department of CommerceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
  2. Idaho Wool Growers Ass'n v. VilsackDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2014
  3. Judicial Watch Inc v. U.S. Department of CommerceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
  4. Naacp Legal Defense & Educational Fund, Inc. v. BarrDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API