Idaho Wool Growers Ass'n v. Vilsack
District Court, D. Idaho
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
A. WALLACE TASHIMA, United States Circuit Judge.
Now pending before the court are the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment, which have been fully briefed and argued and, on March 17, 2014, taken under submission. For the reasons set forth below, Defendants’ and Intervenors-De-fendants’ motions are granted. Plaintiffs’ motion is denied.
I. Background
In 2003, Defendants completed a revision of the 1988 Payette National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan. FS005768 [ROD at 1]. The Intermountain Regional Forester received a number of appeals of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Marsh v. Oregon Natural Resources CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- The Lands Council v. McNairCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Diamondstar Entertainment Holdings, LLC v. THH LLCDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2022
- Mickey Gaines v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2020
- Robert Saavedra v. Volkswagen AktengesellschaftDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2020