Legal Opinion

Idaho Wool Growers Ass'n v. Vilsack

District Court, D. Idaho

Decided March 25, 2014No. Case No. 1:12 CV-469 AWTPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

A. WALLACE TASHIMA, United States Circuit Judge.

Now pending before the court are the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment, which have been fully briefed and argued and, on March 17, 2014, taken under submission. For the reasons set forth below, Defendants’ and Intervenors-De-fendants’ motions are granted. Plaintiffs’ motion is denied.

I. Background

In 2003, Defendants completed a revision of the 1988 Payette National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan. FS005768 [ROD at 1]. The Intermountain Regional Forester received a number of appeals of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Marsh v. Oregon Natural Resources CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. The Lands Council v. McNairCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Diamondstar Entertainment Holdings, LLC v. THH LLCDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2022
  2. Mickey Gaines v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2020
  3. Robert Saavedra v. Volkswagen AktengesellschaftDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API