Smith v. Exxon Mobil Corp.
District Court, D. New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
IRENAS, Senior District Judge.
Presently before this Court is Defendant Exxon Mobil Corporation’s Motion for Summary Judgment. 1 Since Plaintiffs claim for negligent infliction of emotional distress is precluded by New Jersey workman’s compensation law, summary judgement will be granted as to Count IV of the Complaint. As to Plaintiffs remaining claims, she has raised a material dispute of fact regarding the conduct of Exxon Mobil employees and management, and so summary judgement will be denied.
I
A
Plaintiff Kimberly Smith (“Smith” or “Plaintiff’) was employed by Defendant Exxon Mobil…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Faragher v. City of Boca RatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Burlington Industries, Inc. v. EllerthSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Luis A. Fuentes v. Steven P. Perskie, Chairman of the New Jersey Casino Control Commission the New Jersey Casino Control CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Cutler v. DornSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2008
- Grazioli v. Genuine Parts Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2005
- BEAMAN-BATES v. ACME MARKETS, INC.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2020
- COLEMAN v. DELANEY'S CAPE MAY, LLC.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2019
- CONTE v. GOODWINDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2021
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.