Grantham v. Coleman Co.
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Jackson, J.:
The present appeal arises out of a proceeding before the Workmens Compensation Commissioner (now Director). This is an unusual proceeding in that it is prosecuted by the appellant Dr. Thomas Van Winkle, a chiropractor, to recover $91.00 for services rendered to W. Grantham, an employee of the Coleman Company, Inc., who with its insurance carrier are shown as appellees and actually are opposing the doctor in this proceeding.
Stating the case more clearly, Grantham was an employee of the Coleman company and on December 31, 1959, injured his…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Wilson Drilling Co. v. BeyerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- Higley v. SchlessmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
3Cited by3 opinions
- Zeeland Community Hospital v. Vander WalMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
- Hagerty v. Great American Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1965
- Sloat Chiropractic Clinic v. Steve Evans DatsunCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1986