Landers v. Jameson
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1DissentDonald L. Corbin, Justice
The majority holds that Ark. Code Ann. §§ 18-27-202 and -203 (1987) are un-constitutional as applied to Appellant Big Daddy’s Pawn Shop in mandating the Pawn Shop to return pawned, stolen property to its true owner, Appellee Ken Jameson, before a judicial determination of ownership had been made. In so holding, the majority concludes that (1) the Pawn Shop had an enforceable property interest as against the true owner, (2) that Jameson was a state actor, and (3) that the trial afforded to the Pawn Shop in the district court did not satisfy the requirements of due process. I disagree with…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Rassner v. Federal Collateral Society, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1941
- Snethen v. Oklahoma State Union of the Farmers Educational & Cooperative UnionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
- Adkisson v. WaitmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
- Buck v. GillhamCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2003
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.